Applying Nature-inspired Innovation to Space Engineering

Spacecraft must withstand hostile and variable environments, similar to the challenges faced by living organisms. By studying how biological systems have evolved to survive and thrive in diverse conditions, we can draw inspiration for innovative space engineering solutions.

 

Abstracting Biological Principles

The key to successful nature-inspired innovation is not to replicate biological organisms exactly, but rather to understand and abstract the fundamental principles and mechanisms that enable their success. This involves:

  • Identifying the essential functions and processes that contribute to an organism's survival.

  • Analysing the underlying principles that enable those functions

  • .Adapting and applying those principles to engineered systems

 

For example, artificial neural networks used in spacecraft control systems are highly simplified abstractions of biological neural architectures.

 

Benefits of Nature-inspired Innovation for Space Engineering

Nature-inspired innovation can provide several benefits for space engineering:

  • Satisfying solutions: Biology often evolves "satisfying" solutions that are well-adapted to the environment, rather than optimal solutions. These can inspire robust, efficient designs.

  • Robustness and adaptability: Biological systems excel at adapting to variable environments, a critical need for spacecraft exploring unknown conditions.

  • Autonomy: The vast distances in space require high levels of spacecraft autonomy. Biological organisms exhibit autonomy par excellence and can inspire new approaches.

  • Miniaturisation: Nature-inspired innovation can enable greater miniaturisation, integration, and packaging efficiency, reducing spacecraft volume, mass, and power requirements.

 

Holistic System Design

Holistic, integrated designs characterise biological systems. Adopting a nature-inspired innovation approach in space engineering could involve treating the spacecraft as a unified system, with the payload and subsystems designed concurrently and multidisciplinarity.

 

This approach views the spacecraft's behaviour and interaction with the environment as the primary output, rather than treating the payload separately. The modular, hierarchical organisation of biological systems can inspire the division of spacecraft subsystems.

 

Guidelines for Implementing Nature-inspired Innovation Concepts

When applying nature-inspired innovation to space engineering, it's important to recognize the differences between biological and engineered systems:

  • Shapes: Biological structures often have curved surfaces, while engineered ones favour straight edges.

  • Materials: Engineered products usually use homogeneous materials, while biological materials are composites.

  • Stiffness vs. strength: Engineered structures prioritise stiffness, while biological ones favour strength for toughness.

  • Multifunctionality: Biological features often serve multiple roles.

 

To successfully adapt nature-inspired solutions, engineers should consider the following guidelines:

  1. Nature-inspired innovation can provide a good starting point for design.

  2. Pure nature-inspired innovation may yield non-optimal solutions; some adaptation is usually necessary.

  3. Traditional engineering approaches may sometimes provide the optimal solution.

  4. Biology relies heavily on "soft" materials and should be judiciously applied to "hard" engineering.

 

By thoughtfully abstracting and applying biological principles, space engineers can develop innovative, robust, and efficient solutions for the challenges of exploring the final frontier.

 

Challenges of Implementing Nature-inspired Innovation Concepts

While nature-inspired innovation offers promising solutions for space engineering, there are several challenges in translating biological principles into engineered systems. Understanding these differences and establishing guidelines for adopting nature-inspired solutions is crucial for successful implementation.

 

Differences Between Biological and Engineered Systems

There are several key differences between biological and engineered systems that need to be considered when designing bio-inspired solutions:

  1. Shapes: Biological structures often have cylindrical shapes and curved surfaces, while engineered structures generally have straight edges and sharp corners.

  2. Materials: Engineered products are usually constructed from homogeneous materials, while biological materials are composites to varying degrees.

  3. Stiffness vs. strength: Engineered structures are designed for stiffness (and tend to be brittle), while organisms favour strength over stiffness for toughness.

  4. Multifunctionality: Biological features often serve multiple roles, while engineered components are typically designed for specific functions.

 

These differences highlight the need to carefully abstract and adapt biological principles, rather than attempting to directly replicate biological structures.

 

Guidelines for Adopting Nature-inspired Solutions

When reverse-engineering concepts from nature and adopting nature-inspired innovation, the following general guidelines are proposed to obtain applicable engineering solutions:

  • Nature-inspired innovation as a starting point: Nature-inspired solutions can provide a good starting point for design, offering insights into alternative strategies and mechanisms.

  • Adaptation of nature-inspired approaches: Pure nature-inspired approaches may yield non-optimal performance solutions. Some adaptation and integration with traditional engineering approaches are usually necessary.

  • Traditional technology may be optimal: In some cases, optimal solutions may result from traditional engineering approaches. Nature-inspired innovation should be seen as a complementary tool, not a replacement for established methods.

  • Judicious application of biological principles: Biology relies heavily on "soft" materials and should be judiciously applied to "hard" engineering. The differences in materials and structures between biological and engineered systems need to be carefully considered.

 

By understanding these challenges and guidelines, engineers can more effectively leverage the potential of nature-inspired innovation for space applications. The key is to abstract the fundamental principles and mechanisms from biology and adapt them to the specific constraints and requirements of space engineering.

 

Hi, we're Biomimicry Innovation Lab. We partner with founders and leaders to transform ideas into reality, drawing inspiration from transformative solutions found in nature. Our approach? Harnessing the latest scientific research with innovative tools to deliver solutions to complex challenges.

Reach out for a virtual coffee to discuss ideas.

Previous
Previous

Flight or Fight? Bio-inspired Solutions Take To The Skies.

Next
Next

Revolutionising Research and Innovation: The Digital Transformation of the UK's Natural History Collections.